Sub-menu 1.2.1.1

News and Articles        



Business and Commercial Law
Construction and Public Contracts
Insurance, Risk Management and Title Insurance
Healthcare
Labor and Employment Law
Real Estate and Environmental Law
Common Interest Community Law
International Business and Dispute Resolution

Business and Commercial Law

Construction Industry Update

Thursday, May 16, 2013

Economists remain cautiously optimistic about the construction industry in 2013.

http://preview.tinyurl.com/axs45np

 

For more information about this topic please contact:

 

Christopher E. Ng, Partner

Gibbs Giden Locher Turner Senet & Wittbrodt LLP

1880 Century Park East, 12th Floor

Los Angeles, California 90067

Phone: (310) 552-3400

email: cng@ggltsw.com

 

The content contained herein is published online by Gibbs Giden Locher Turner Senet & Wittbrodt LLP ("GGLTSW") for informational purposes only, may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements, and does not constitute legal advice. Do not act on the information contained herein without seeking the advice of licensed counsel. For specific questions about any of the content discussed herein or any of the content posted to this website please contact the article attorney author or send an email to info@ggltsw.com. The transmission of information on this, the GGLTSW website, or any transmission or exchange of information over the Internet, or by any of the included links is not intended to create and does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. For a complete description of the terms of use of this website please see the Legal Notices section at www.ggltsw.com/legalnotice. This publication may not be reproduced or used in whole or in part without written consent of the firm.

 

Copyright 2013 Gibbs Giden Locher Turner Senet & Wittbrodt LLP

 


Can a telecommuting business owner be in “control” of a veteran, DBE, MBE or WBE business?

Monday, May 13, 2013
That was the issue in the recent KWV, Incorporated v. United States (May 2, 2013) case.  Last year, the Veterans Administration (“VA”) sustained a competitor’s bid protest claiming that the owner of a Rhode Island service-disabled, veteran-owned business (“SDVOSB”) did not have enough control over day-to-day management of his business because he lived in Florida for part of the year.  Arguing that he managed the day-to-day business by telephone, e-mail and other electronic means and traveled to Rhode Island when necessary to attend meetings, the veteran business owner appealed to the United States Court of Federal Claims – and prevailed.  The court found that the veteran's residency and decision to live in Florida for part of the year did not preclude him from "controlling" the business within the meaning of 38 CFR §74.4.   In fact, other than the VA’s “misplaced reliance” on the veteran’s residency, there was nothing to suggest that the veteran “was not exercising sufficient control” over his business.    

 

Although each small business program operates according to unique rules and regulations, the KMV case may provide other DBE, MBE and WBE business owners with legal precedent to argue that the can properly manage the affairs of their business from afar. The court’s opinion can be found at http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/LETTOW.KWV050913.pdf

 

For more information about this topic please contact:

 

Christopher E. Ng, Partner

Gibbs Giden Locher Turner Senet & Wittbrodt LLP

1880 Century Park East, 12th Floor

Los Angeles, California 90067

Phone: (310) 552-3400

email: cng@ggltsw.com

 

The content contained herein is published online by Gibbs Giden Locher Turner Senet & Wittbrodt LLP ("GGLTSW") for informational purposes only, may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements, and does not constitute legal advice. Do not act on the information contained herein without seeking the advice of licensed counsel. For specific questions about any of the content discussed herein or any of the content posted to this website please contact the article attorney author or send an email to info@ggltsw.com. The transmission of information on this, the GGLTSW website, or any transmission or exchange of information over the Internet, or by any of the included links is not intended to create and does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. For a complete description of the terms of use of this website please see the Legal Notices section at www.ggltsw.com/legalnotice. This publication may not be reproduced or used in whole or in part without written consent of the firm.

 

Copyright 2013 Gibbs Giden Locher Turner Senet & Wittbrodt LLP

 


Employers Must Start Using The New Two-Page I-9 Form

Thursday, May 09, 2013

by Christopher E. Ng, Partner

 

Beginning today, employers must use the new two-page I-9 form to verify the identification and employment authorization for all new hires. Employers must also use the new I-9 form for rehires or the re-verification of existing employees, if necessary.  Substantial penalties apply for employers who fail to use the new form or incorrectly complete the new form so it is imperative to carefully review the instructions.  

 

The new form is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/i-9.pdf

 

For more information please visit the following U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services government website:

USCIS - Employers Must Use Revised Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification  


For more information about this topic please contact:

Christopher E. Ng, Partner

Gibbs Giden Locher Turner Senet & Wittbrodt LLP
1880 Century Park East, 12th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067
Phone: (310) 552-3400
email: cng@ggltsw.com


The content contained herein is published online by Gibbs Giden Locher Turner Senet & Wittbrodt LLP ("GGLTSW") for informational purposes only, may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements, and does not constitute legal advice. Do not act on the information contained herein without seeking the advice of licensed counsel. For specific questions about any of the content discussed herein or any of the content posted to this website please contact the article attorney author or send an email to info@ggltsw.com. The transmission of information on this, the GGLTSW website, or any transmission or exchange of information over the Internet, or by any of the included links is not intended to create and does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. For a complete description of the terms of use of this website please see the Legal Notices section at www.ggltsw.com/legalnotice. This publication may not be reproduced or used in whole or in part without written consent of the firm.

Copyright 2013 Gibbs Giden Locher Turner Senet & Wittbrodt LLP

 


NORTH AMERICAN BUSINESS OF FYFE GROUP, LLC SOLD TO INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Monday, September 19, 2011
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, September 19, 2011 - Fyfe Group, LLC was acquired by Insituform Technologies, Inc. (Nasdaq Global Select Market: INSU). The total purchase price was approximately $115 million.

 

William Locher, Seth Eaton, and Jonathan Wolf of Gibbs, Giden, Locher, Turner & Senet LLP represented the seller, Fyfe Group, LLC, and provided legal services related to due diligence, negotiation of the purchase agreement, and documentation of all related aspects of the transaction. The transaction closed on August 31, 2011.

 

Fyfe Group, based in San Diego, California, is a pioneer and industry leader in the development, manufacture and installation of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) systems for the structural repair, strengthening and restoration of pipelines (oil, gas, water and wastewater), buildings (commercial, Federal, municipal, residential and parking garages), bridges and tunnels, and waterfront structures.

 

Insituform Technologies, Inc., based in Chesterfield, Missouri, is a global leader in infrastructure protection. They provide proprietary technologies and services for the corrosion protection of industrial pipelines and for rehabilitating and strengthening sewer, water, energy, and mining piping systems.

 

About Gibbs, Giden, Locher, Turner & Senet LLP

Founded in 1978, GGLTS focuses on serving the interests of the construction and real estate industries with attorneys admitted in California, Nevada, and Arizona. GGLTS represents a wide range of clients in litigation, transactions, and other related matters.

#########

For More Information Contact Us at:
Gibbs, Giden, Locher, Turner & Senet LLP
1880 Century Park East, Suite 1200
Los Angeles, California 90067
Phone: (310) 552-3400
Email: info@gglts.com or lpabon@gglts.com
www.gglts.com

 

PRINT

 

PRNewswire Press Release link


The content contained herein is published online by Gibbs, Giden, Locher, Turner & Senet LLP ("GGLTS") for informational purposes only, may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements, and does not constitute legal advice. Do not act on the information contained herein without seeking the advice of licensed counsel. For specific questions about any of the content discussed herein or any of the content posted to this website please contact the article attorney author or send an email to info@gglts.com. The transmission of information on this, the GGLTS website, or any transmission or exchange of information over the Internet, or by any of the included links is not intended to create and does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. For a complete description of the terms of use of this website please see the Legal Notices section below.

 

This publication may not be reproduced or used in whole or in part without written consent of the firm.

Copyright 2011 Gibbs, Giden, Locher, Turner & Senet LLP


California Business and Commercial Law Article

Tuesday, April 19, 2011
TEN IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS WHEN PURCHASING A BUSINESS
by Jonathan B. Wolf, Esq.

In the game of buying and selling businesses, information is king. In order to evaluate a potential acquisition correctly and to avoid entering into an inauspicious deal, the buyer must thoroughly investigate the target business. This process is generally referred to as “due diligence”.

A careful and thorough due diligence investigation should be part of every acquisition. The nature and scope of a due diligence investigation will depend on the structure of the proposed acquisition (asset sale or stock sale), the financial condition of the seller, whether the seller will continue to operate a business after the transaction, and the value of the transaction. Set forth below is a list of ten important issues that a buyer must confront and evaluate as part of its due diligence prior to purchasing the business. The following list is intended to be a starting point in a buyer’s investigation and is not intended to be all-inclusive; rather, it is simply a guide to help a buyer make an informed decision. Once the issues are properly analyzed, a buyer may better ascertain whether the business should be acquired and whether the proposed purchase price is appropriate.

(1) Assess the "True Value" of the Target's Assets to Your Business: First, ask yourself whether the business has something your business currently needs, and evaluate whether you can acquire the same or similar assets in a less costly manner. Assuming that you are still inclined to acquire the asset, consider whether you have the ability to protect the asset in a meaningful way. If the asset is manufacturing property and equipment, for example, the inquiry may be more practical and straightforward. However, if the asset is intellectual property (such as a patented manufacturing process or unprotectable recipes), the asset could potentially decline in value and evaluation may be more involved.

The buyer should ask the seller to prepare a list of all the assets that the buyer will be acquiring as part of the acquisition. The list should include all real, personal and intangible property and the list of physical assets. The buyer should ensure that the seller actually possesses title to the assets it intends to sell. Buyers (and sellers, too) are sometimes surprised to discover that the seller only leases or licenses critical assets from third-parties, and therefore cannot sell them outright. In these situations the results can vary widely, and the buyer should re¬ evaluate the entire deal. Sometimes the true owner is an active part of the business and is cooperative, but often the owner is a third-party who wants something in exchange for his/her consent to the sale.

Finally, the character of the assets and the actual assets should be evaluated. A "bulk transfer" of certain assets from inventory, for instance, often triggers a notice to creditors and can significantly delay the closing. Also, the assets should be checked against the seller’s depreciation schedule to verify that the principal assets have been identified. With a manufacturing, distribution or retail business, the buyer needs to make arrangements to take a physical inventory immediately prior to the closing. The final asset list should be attached as an exhibit to any sale agreement.

(2) Employment and Labor Matters: Experienced businesspeople often state that a business' most valuable "asset" is its employees. In a small acquisition, the buyer should request a list of all of the Seller's employees, which includes each employee’s name, position/title, date of hire, and compensation. The buyer should also review copies of all agreements, contracts or commitments relating to each employee. The buyer should verify that the employment agreement has properly transferred to the employer all intellectual property created by the employees while they were working in the business. If not, the buyer must ensure that buyer obtains an assignment of these rights prior to the close of the sale.

If there are certain key employees who are essential to the success of the business, the buyer may want to make the execution of a new employment agreement with these employees a condition precedent to closing. In such situations, sophisticated buyers go to great effort to align these employees' interests with those of the buyer. This may entail holding back a portion of the purchase price to ensure that certain employees remain to smoothly transition the business to the new owners, or by structuring employee bonuses based upon future performance of the business.

Owner-employees, after selling their business to the buyer, sometimes want to retire or pursue other ventures, either immediately after the sale or at some point thereafter. Since the owner-employee typically has special knowledge of the inner-workings of the business, the owner-employee would be a formidable competitor if the buyer's new business were forced to compete against him or her. As a result, buyers often insist on obtaining a non-competition agreement from the owner-employee, which is generally an enforceable restriction in California in this context. Non-competition agreements should be carefully crafted and are often heavily negotiated to include or exclude certain types of businesses and geographical areas, and frequently place limits on soliciting vendors and employees. The buyer should start to formulate a list of proposed restrictions during the due diligence process, based upon the nature of the business being purchased and the business' susceptibility to certain types of competition.

(3) Financial Statements: The buyer should carefully review the seller's most recent interim balance sheet and income statement, as well as the annual financial statements for at least the last three years. The buyer should also request the most recent accounts receivables aging report and the accounts payable ledger, particularly if the buyer is purchasing or collecting the receivables or assuming any of the payables as part of the proposed transaction. Remember to read all notes that are a part of the financial statements and ask a good accountant for guidance.

(4) Basic Corporate Documents: The buyer should ask buyer's counsel to review a seller's basic corporate documents, including its articles of incorporation, by-laws and meeting minutes for the past several years. These documents reveal the rights and powers of the shareholders, directors and officers, and can often impact the operation of the business and the legal structure required to acquire the seller's business. The meeting minutes may reveal problems and potential issues that were not disclosed by the seller, and give an insight into how frequently the seller's officers and directors have come and gone.

(5) Loans and Credit Facilities: The buyer should inquire as to the status of all outstanding loans, liens, mortgages, lines of credit, and other credit facilities, and whether each is in compliance with all loan covenants. Further, the buyer should request information as to the status of any credit accounts used by the seller and essential to the operation of the business.

(6) Governmental Licenses, Permits and Filings: The buyer should determine whether the operation of the business requires any special licenses or permits. If so, the buyer should confirm that these licenses and permits can be transferred to the buyer as part of the sale. If not, the transaction may need to be restructured and/or conditioned upon the buyer’s receipt of the required permit or license.

(7) Leases and Licenses: The buyer must obtain and analyze all existing real estate leases and personal property leases or licenses for terms that might be triggered by the purchase and sale. Lease agreements, for instance, routinely provide that a change in ownership automatically requires prior consent of the lessor, and the process of obtaining this consent often delays the closing and requires that payment or additional security be provided to the landlord. Be sure to request copies of leases and licenses early in the due diligence process.

(8) Contingent Liabilities and Potential Claims: In addition to the liabilities shown on the financial statements, it is essential to identify and address all contingent liabilities and potential claims ("off balance sheet liabilities"). The buyer should ask the seller to disclose any litigation involving the seller, as well as any and all contingent liabilities or potential claims.

(9) Environmental: Liability for the cleanup of hazardous waste has been a hot topic for many years, particularly because liability can be imposed without actual knowledge of the environmental condition. Still, many buyers fail to adequately investigate the existence of hazardous substances at the seller’s place of business. The buyer should confirm that there are no pending or foreseeable environmental liabilities that will be imposed on the buyer as a result of the sale.

(10) Customer Lists, Vendor Agreements and Pending Orders: Customer lists are usually proprietary and sellers often are unwilling to release the identity of their customers until the closing. However, the buyer should review pending customer orders and outstanding purchase orders to determine the business’ upcoming commitments. The buyer should also confirm that the seller’s principal customers and vendors will continue to do business with the buyer after the closing. In addition to requesting the foregoing information from the seller, the buyer may want to acquire additional information through the use of corporate search firms, credit bureaus, investigators and other consultants. Another invaluable tool is simply running an Internet search such as Google and combing through the results. You never know what you might find.

The due diligence process may seem overwhelming, but is well worth the effort, as it will provide the buyer with invaluable clarity as to whether the business he or she is purchasing is a sound investment.

The content contained herein is published online by Gibbs, Giden, Locher, Turner & Senet LLP ("GGLTS") for informational purposes only, may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements, and does not constitute legal advice. Do not act on the information contained herein without seeking the advice of licensed counsel. For specific questions about any of the content discussed herein or any of the content posted to this website please contact the article attorney author or send an email to info@gglts.com. The transmission of information on this, the GGLTS website, or any transmission or exchange of information over the Internet, or by any of the included links is not intended to create and does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. For a complete description of the terms of use of this website please see the Legal Notices section below.

This publication may not be reproduced or used in whole or in part without written consent of the firm.

Copyright 2011 Gibbs, Giden, Locher, Turner & Senet LLP

Federal Trade Commission Regulation Update

Tuesday, October 27, 2009
FTC IDENTITY THEFT “RED FLAGS RULE” ENFORCEMENT STARTS 11/1/2009
By Seth W. Eaton, Esq.

On November 1, 2009, the long-awaited enforcement by the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) of the identity theft regulations commonly known as the Red Flags Rule (hereinafter the “Rule”) will finally arrive. While certain federal agencies (e.g., banking and credit union regulators such as the OCC, Federal Reserve System, FDIC, OTS and NCUA) began enforcement of the Rule right away, the FTC postponed its enforcement to provide businesses with guidance and additional time to develop policies that comply with the Rule’s requirements. The FTC enforcement starts next week, therefore it is important for you to know that there are financial and other penalties for non-compliance. This article gives a quick overview to help you determine if your business is required to be in compliance with the Rule and reviews the penalties for non-compliance.

DOES THIS RULE APPLY TO MY BUSINESS?

The Rule applies to “financial institutions” and “creditors.” It is important to note, however, that these terms do not have their normally understood industry definitions, but rather are based on the specific business activities and practices of each company.

DO MATERIAL SUPPLIERS AND CONTRACTORS HAVE TO COMPLY?

As a material supplier or contractor who collects and maintains personal financial information in connection with credit sales or the performance of a project, you must carefully consider whether your activities or practices make you a financial institution or creditor under the Rule.

Financial Institution: A financial institution is a state or national bank, credit union, or any other person that, directly or indirectly, holds a transaction account belonging to a consumer. A “transaction account” is one from which the owner may make payments or transfers to third parties, including but not limited to, checking accounts, negotiable orders of withdrawal accounts and share draft accounts.

Creditor:
A creditor is any person or entity, who as part of his or her business, defers payment for goods or services and bills customers other than at the point of sale. This category also includes businesses that regularly grant or arrange loans, extend credit, or make credit decisions. Accordingly, if your business provides goods or services on credit, you will be considered a creditor for purposes of the Rule.

Since it is extremely unlikely that a contractor or a material supplier would be considered a “Financial Institution” as defined above, the focus should be on whether your construction or supply business falls under the definition of a “Creditor”. If you are involved in a construction project or purchase order where you perform work or deliver materials and allow the owner or customer to make payment at a later time (e.g. net 15 days from delivery OR within 10 days of completion of each phase of the project), then you are probably a “Creditor”.

WHAT DOES THE RULE REQUIRE OF CREDITORS?

Once you determine that you are a creditor, you must conduct periodic risk assessments to identify if you have any “covered accounts,” of which there are two categories: (i) a consumer account offered to customers primarily for personal, family, or household purposes which is designed to permit multiple payments or transactions, and (ii) any other account offered to consumers that poses a reasonably foreseeable risk of identity theft to customers or to the creditor.

Again, material suppliers and contractors generally do not have accounts falling into the first category, and most account would be classified as “commercial” rather than “consumer” accounts. However, if you require a personal guaranty, credit application, financial statements or other personal information from your customers as a condition to deferring payment for goods or services, then there is the possibility that the information collected by your company could be used in connection with identity theft. For example, if a customer has access to his or her account and personal information via the internet or by telephone, then a hacker or other person masquerading as the customer could potentially access the customer’s personal information. Under those circumstances, there may be a reasonably foreseeable risk of identity theft. By contrast, if the personal information contained in a credit application or personal guaranty is stored in a company filing cabinet (and not made available electronically), the risk of identity theft would be reduced (but not eliminated), since the information can only be accessed by a relatively limited number of people. Finally, because most small business accounts, sole proprietorship accounts and single transaction consumer accounts contain personal information of the customer, they will generally be considered covered accounts.

DO I NEED AN IDENTITY THEFT PREVENTION PROGRAM?

If you are a creditor with covered accounts (or you anticipate having covered accounts), then you are required to develop a written Identity Theft Prevention Program. The Rule sets out four essential elements for the development, implementation, and administration of the program:

1. The program must have policies and procedures to indentify threats of potential identity theft that you may encounter in the day-to-day operation of your business. As an example, if a customer places several orders that are abnormal (either because of the size or content) for the customer, then such activity might be a “red flag”.

2. The program must be designed to detect the red flags that your company has identified. Expanding on the example above, once the abnormal orders are identified, you should contact the customer to verify the order information and confirm that the order was not fraudulently placed on their behalf.

3. The program must set forth the actions to be taken once red flags are detected, which may include notifying law enforcement.

4. The program must be subject to periodic review and re-assessment to address the constantly changing risks posed by identity theft.

In addition, if you are subject to the Rule, you must; (a) have your program approved by your board of directors; (b) train staff to administer the program; and (c) oversee the activities of the third parties you engage to manage customer accounts and personal information.

WHAT ARE THE PENALTIES FOR NON-COMPLIANCE?

The FTC can seek both civil penalties and injunctive relief for violations of the Rule. A maximum penalty of $3,500 may be assessed for each violation of the Rule. If the FTC obtains an injunction, your future compliance with the rule will be mandated by the court, and you may be required to provide reports, retain documents, and take other steps to ensure compliance with both the Rule and the court order. Failure to comply with the court order could subject you to further penalties and the contempt power of the court.

In these economic times, losing a client due to identity theft is bad and being under investigation by the FTC is even worse. Gibbs, Giden, Locher, Turner and Senet LLP has provided legal services to the Construction and Real Estate industries for over 30 years. Our law firm is available to assist you with the development of an appropriate program for your business, as well as an initial assessment of whether you are required to comply with the requirements set forth in the Rule. Please contact us at info@gglts.com for additional information about this article.

The content contained herein is published online by Gibbs, Giden, Locher, Turner & Senet LLP ("GGLTS") for informational purposes only, may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements, and does not constitute legal advice. Do not act on the information contained herein without seeking the advice of licensed counsel. For specific questions about any of the content discussed herein or any of the content posted to this website please contact the article attorney author or send an email to info@gglts.com. The transmission of information on this, the GGLTS website, or any transmission or exchange of information over the Internet, or by any of the included links is not intended to create and does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. For a complete description of the terms of use of this website please see the Legal Notices section below.

This publication may not be reproduced or used in whole or in part without written consent of the firm.

Copyright 2011 Gibbs, Giden, Locher, Turner & Senet LLP



Recent Posts


Tags


Archive